Great new feature, thanks!
Just a quick query. I tested sending from one server to another, both with zfs backed storage and expected to see a zfs send behind the scenes, but it seems to be using rsync, which I guess is a lot slower than zfs send.
I thought from reading the original thread the idea was to use the zfs send or btrfs send if you have that type of storage backing your system as its more efficient? I know with syncoid it will send in a second if there are not many changes between storage dataset and this uses zfs send.